TPE Material Development Case: Detailed Explanation of the Application of TN60B TPE Coating for Electric Tool Handle Grips


 

I. Customer Needs and Background

The customer is an electric tool manufacturer, and their core requirements are as follows:

  • Rubber-coating adhesion It bonds firmly with PA substrates (including glass fiber-reinforced PA, PA6, and PA66) and carries no risk of delamination.
  • Hand feel and durability Smooth and delicate surface texture, with a hardness of 60A (Shore A), resistant to oil stains and abrasion.
  • Processing adaptability Adapts to a 220℃ injection molding process, with a molding cycle of ≤30 seconds and a yield rate exceeding 95%.
  • Cost-controllable Under the premise of ensuring performance, the material cost must be 10% lower than that of similar products on the market.

II. Development Process and Sample Validation

1. First-generation test sample: TN70B-15 (Result: NG)

  • Adjust direction
    • Increase the hardness to 70A (Shore A), with the goal of enhancing the handle's impact resistance.
    • Increase the glass fiber filler ratio, with a target tensile strength of 5 MPa.
  • Reason for failure
    • The hardness is too high (measured at 72A), and customers have reported poor comfort when holding the handle, leading to fatigue after prolonged use.
    • The melt index has dropped to 6 g/10 min (190℃/5 kg), making injection molding filling difficult and resulting in a yield rate of only 65%.
    • Microcracks have appeared at the rubber-coated interface, and the adhesion strength does not meet the standard.
  • Conclusion NG There is an imbalance between hardness and machinability.

2. Second test sample: TN65A-05 (Result: NG)

  • Adjust direction
    • Reduce the hardness to 65A (Shore A) by using a low-cost plasticizer, with the goal of achieving a 15% cost reduction.
    • Optimize fluidity, with a melt index target of 8 g/10 min.
  • Reason for failure
    • The adhesive strength of the rubber-coated bond has decreased (peel strength < 20 N/cm), and the interface between the PA substrate and TPE is prone to separation.
    • After the oil resistance test (ASTM D471, 24 hours), the surface swelled and felt sticky to the touch.
    • Costs were reduced by 12%, but overall performance failed to meet the standard.
  • Conclusion NG It's not feasible to sacrifice performance in exchange for cost advantages.

3. Final solution: TN60B-DDGJ (Result: OK)

  • Formula Design
    • TPE matrix + polar modifier to enhance chemical bonding with PA.
    • Add nano-talc powder to balance hardness (60A) with a smooth, silky surface feel.
  • Performance performance
    • The peel adhesion of the coated material is greater than 35 N/cm, and it has passed a cold-and-hot cycling test from -40℃ to 80℃ (200 cycles without cracking).
    • Melt index: 9 g/10 min (190℃/5 kg); injection molding cycle: 25 seconds; yield rate: 98%.
    • Tensile strength: 4 MPa; elongation at break: 500%; tear strength: 24 kN/m; well-balanced overall performance.
  • Verification result
    • Customer mass-production testing: 5,000 units produced continuously, with a 99.2% pass rate for encapsulation and excellent tactile feedback that has received positive feedback from end users.
    • Costs are 8% lower than those of competitors, achieving the business goal.
  • Conclusion OK Passed acceptance testing and has achieved mass supply.
  •  

 


III. Key Issues and Solutions

Test material model

Core issue

Solution Strategy

TN70B-15

Excessive hardness leads to poor comfort.

Abandon fiberglass reinforcement and return to a basic stiffness design.

TN65A-05

Low-cost additives weaken adhesion.

Using a polarity modifier to enhance interfacial adhesion.

TN60B- DDGJ

Balanced surface feel and oil resistance

Introducing nano-talc powder to optimize surface properties.

 


IV. Case Summary and Value

  1. Technical Insights
  2. For TPE-coated products, interface adhesion strength should be prioritized, with chemical compatibility taking precedence over individual mechanical properties.
  3. Matching the melt index with the injection molding process is a key factor in improving yield.
  4. Commercial value
  5. TN60B- DDGJ After successful importation, the customer’s annual procurement volume increased to 20 tons, and its market share grew by 15%.
  6. Establish a dedicated formulation library for “PA-coated TPE,” shortening the development cycle for similar projects by 30%.
  7. Follow-up plan
  8. Develop TN60B- DDGJ   The Pro series supports antistatic (surface resistance ≤ 1×10^9 Ω) and flame-retardant (UL94 V-2) features.
  9. Explore the two-color injection molding process to achieve integrated molding of complex textures and colors.